Israel's public sector is presently struck by "virtual strikes", since the National Labor Court forbade the national trade union federation Histadrut from calling a total general strike.
In case you were wondering if the Histadrut is engaged in a noble struggle for social justice in Israel, think again. The Histadrut long ago ceased to be the representative of low-wage workers and welfare recipients, and de facto became the main engine for protecting the interests of workers in the civil service and state-owned corporation, many of whom with bloated salaries and gargantuan benefit packages devoid of all economic or even social rationale, or of any connection to job performance. This resulted in a Catch-22: private sector workers who know that in any case they cannot count on the Histadrut let their membership lapse or no longer bother to become members in the first place, making the Histadrut even more beholden to the 'union locals' ("centrales") who need their services least.
The "threats to social justice" that the Histadrut has been disruptiing the economy over for weeks, and threatening to shut down the country altogether, include plans to privatize government-owned companies such as the Port and Railroad Authority and the Electric Corp., as well as make it easier to fire poorly performing employees in the civil service. As usual, it is the truly disadvantaged (welfare recipients unable to claim their checks, the working poor who rely on public transportation) who suffer most.
The day before yesterday, the mass circulation daily Maariv (article in Hebrew) gave us a glimpse into the absurd remuneration conditions in some of the companies slated for privatization. For instance, an ordinary dockside port worker brings home a whopping NIS 50,000 (US$11,000, or 10,000 Euro) per month. A crew foreman about NIS 75,000. (For reference: the Prime Minister's salary is NIS 33,000 --- less than the salary of an ordinary technician at the Broadcasting Authority.) An ordinary worker at the Electric Co. not only will earn as much as a tenured university professor, but gets as much electricity for free as (s)he can use up. (When it was recently suggested to cap the 'free' electricity at five times the average household consumption, the electricians threatened to shut the country down.) I can add other examples: in one university town -- despite the dire financial straits of the municipality --- the head of the garbage collection service draws a salary that exceeds that of the Chancellor of the university. (The State Comptroller's Report cites cases every year of organizations where employees get paid for so much 'guaranteed overtime' that they end up 'working' 7-day weeks of more than 24 hours per day.)
Do not get me wrong: I have nothing against trade unions as such. The fact that vigorous worker's rights activism occasionally forces an employer to put up with a truly incompetent and/or lazy employee no more invalidates the concept of a trade union than the occasional acquittal of the guilty in court delegitimizes the concept of counsel for the defense. But the Histadrut, over time, has degenerated in fact --- if not necessarily in intent --- into what I can only describe as a 'reverse Robin Hood'. For let there be no mistake --- someone is holding the bag for all this. And that 'someone' is Joe Q. Public.